Systematic Comparative Approaches to the Archaeological Record

The Emergence of Premodern States pp 33-49
DOI: 10.37911/9781947864030.03

3. Systematic Comparative Approaches to the Archaeological Record

Author: Laura Fortunato, University of Oxford and Santa Fe Institute

 

Excerpt

Increasingly, interdisciplinary research teams are coming together to try to establish regularities, over space and time, in the complex system that is the human phenomenon (see, for example, Kohler et al., chapter 6 in this volume). Although vocabulary and tools have changed, the questions that animate this research program bear striking similarity to those pursued by nineteenth-century intellectuals in a quest to establish universal laws shaping human affairs. In fact, that very quest provided the impetus for the emergence of what would later become distinct disciplines in the social and historical sciences, including anthropology1 and sociology (see Carneiro 2003; Harris 2001; Trigger 2006).

Why, then, is this interdisciplinary research program often met with skepticism, or even outright resistance, within anthropology?

In this chapter I provide a brief outline of developments in the history of anthropology leading to this state of affairs, in the hope of alleviating misunderstanding between those who support the interdisciplinary research program and those who oppose it. As a practical contribution toward this end, I then provide an overview of key established resources for systematic comparative approaches to the archaeological record. I conclude by discussing challenges and opportunities in this area at the interface with recent developments in related archaeological practice.

References Cited

Alexander, R. D., J. L. Hoogland, R. D. Howard, K. M. Noonan, and P. W. Sherman
1979 Sexual Dimorphisms and Breeding Systems in Pinnipeds, Ungulates, Primates, and Humans. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, edited by N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, pp. 402–435. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts.

Atici, L., S. W. Kansa, J. Lev-Tov, and E. C. Kansa
2013 Other People’s Data: A Demonstration of the Imperative of Publishing Primary Data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20(4):663–681.

Boas, F.
1896 The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology. Science 4(103):901–908.

Boyd, R., and P. J. Richerson
1985 Culture and the Evolutionary Process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Burton, M. L., and D. R. White
1987 Cross-Cultural Surveys Today. Annual Review of Anthropology 16(1):143–160.

Carneiro, R. L.
2003 Evolutionism in Cultural Anthropology: A Critical History. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and M. W. Feldman
1981 Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Center for Digital Antiquity
2015 tDAR: the Digital Archaeological Record. Accessed June 22, 2015, from https://www.tdar.org/.

Dow, M. M.
2007 Galton’s Problem as Multiple Network Autocorrelation Effects: Cultural Trait Transmission and Ecological Constraint. Cross-Cultural Research 41(4):336–363.

Ember, C. R., and M. Ember
2009 Cross-Cultural Research Methods. 2nd ed. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Harris, M.
2001 The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Updated edition. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.

Kansa
2010 Open Context in Context: Cyberinfrastructure and Distributed Approaches to Publish and Preserve Archaeological Data. The SAA Archaeological Record 10(5):12–16.

Kintigh, K. W.
2006 The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71(3):567–578.
2015 Extracting Information from Archaeological Texts. Open Archaeology 1(1). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0004.

Kintigh, K. W., J. H. Altschul, M. C. Beaudry, R. D. Drennan, A. P. Kinzig, T. A. Kohler, W. F. Limp, H. D. G. Maschner, W. K. Michener, T. R. Pauketat, P. N. Peregrine, J. A. Sabloff, T. J. Wilkinson, H. T. Wright, and M. A. Zeder
2014 Grand Challenges for Archaeology. American Antiquity 79(1):5–24.

Kintigh, K. W., J. H. Altschul, A. P. Kinzig, W. F. Limp, W. K. Michener, J. A. Sabloff, E. J. Hackett, T. A. Kohler, B. Ludäscher, and C. A. Lynch
2015 Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data: Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3(1):1–15.

Levinson, D., and M. J. Malone
1980 Toward Explaining Human Culture: A Critical Review of the Findings of Worldwide Cross-Cultural Research. HRAF Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

Mace, R., and M. Pagel
1994 The Comparative Method in Anthropology. Current Anthropology 35(5):549–564.

Michel, J.-B., Y. K. Shen, A. P. Aiden, A. Veres, M. K. Gray, The Google Books Team, J. P. Pickett, D. Hoiberg, D. Clancy, P. Norvig, J. Orwant, S. Pinker, M. A. Nowak, and E. L. Aiden
2011 Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331(6014):176–182.

Murdock, G. P.
1971 Anthropology’s Mythology. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1971):17–24.
1977 Major Emphases in My Comparative Research. Cross-Cultural Research 12(4):217–221.

Murdock, G. P., C. S. Ford, A. E. Hudson, R. Kennedy, L. W. Simmons, and J. W. M. Whiting
2008 Outline of Cultural Materials. 6th ed. HRAF Press, New Haven, Connecticut. Revised with modifications.

Murdock, G. P., and D. R. White
1969 Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Ethnology 8(4):329–369.

Peregrine, P. N.
2001a Cross-Cultural Comparative Approaches in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1):1–18.
2001b Outline of Archaeological Traditions. HRAF Press, New Haven, Connecticut. Revised September 2010.
2003 Atlas of Cultural Evolution. World Cultures 14(1):2–88.
2004 Cross-Cultural Approaches in Archaeology: Comparative Ethnology, Comparative Archaeology, and Archaeoethnology. Journal of Archaeological Research 12(3):281–309.

Peregrine, P. N., and M. Ember (editors)
2001–2002 Encyclopedia of Prehistory. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

Smith, M. E., and P. Peregrine
2012 Approaches to Comparative Analysis in Archaeology. In The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies, edited by M. E. Smith, pp. 4–20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Trigger, B. G.
2003 Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2006 A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Turchin, P., R. Brennan, T. E. Currie, K. C. Feeney, P. François, D. Hoyer, J. G. Manning, A. Marciniak, D. Mullins, A. Palmisano, P. N. Peregrine, E. A. L. Turner, and H. Whitehouse
2015 Seshat: The Global History Databank. Cliodynamics 6(1). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9qx38718.

Tylor, E. B.
1889 On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18:245–272.

White, D. R., M. L. Burton, W. T. Divale, J. P. Gray, A. Korotayev, and D. Khaltourina
n.d. Standard Cross-Cultural Codes. Retrieved August 31, 2007, from http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/courses/SCCCodes.htm.

BACK TO The Emergence of Premodern States