Foundational Papers in Complexity Science pp. 1937–1988
DOI: 10.37911/9781947864542.64
Tripping the Walks Fantastic
Author: Christoph Adami, Michigan State University
Excerpt
When Darwin discovered the three principles that enable biological evolution—inheritance, variation, and selection—he was a long way from a mechanistic understanding of the adaptive process because the informational basis of these three principles—concerning the storage, modification, and meaning of information (Adami 2024)—was still far in the future. The theory of evolution made great strides starting with the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws at the turn of the twentieth century. In the 1930s, J. B. S. Haldane developed the theory of fixation of beneficial mutations, which can be seen as a mathematical consequence of Mendel’s laws (Haldane 1932), Sewall Wright (1932) introduced the concept of adaptive fitness landscapes, and Ronald Fisher (1930) formulated the fundamental principle of natural selection. But because the carriers of information (nucleic acid molecules) were yet to be discovered, these mathematical developments still fell short of a mechanistic picture of adaptation. In particular, the theory could not account for the generation of novelty, but instead only formalized how changes in gene frequency affect organismal fitness.
Bibliography
Adami, C. 2024. The Evolution of Biological Information: How Evolution Creates Complexity, from Viruses to Brains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Desai, M. M., D. S. Fisher, and A. W. Murray. 2007. “The Speed of Evolution and Maintenance of Variation in Asexual Populations.” Current Biology 17 (5): 385–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.072.
Eigen, M., J. McCaskill, and P. Schuster. 1989. “The Molecular Quasi-Species.” In Advances in Chemical Physics, edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice, 75:149–263. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470141243.ch4.
Fisher, R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Gillespie, J. H. 1984. “Molecular Evolution Over the Mutational Landscape.” Evolution 38 (5): 1116–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408444.
Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The Causes of Evolution. London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co.
Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and Tinkering. 196:1161–1166. 4295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.860134.
Kauffman, S. A. 1969. “Metabolic Stability and Epigenesis in Randomly Constructed Genetic Nets.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 22 (3): 437–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(69)90015-0.
Kauffman, S. A., and S. Levin. 1987. “Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 128 (1): 11–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80029-2.
Kauffman, S. A., and E. D. Weinberger. 1989. “The NK Model of Rugged Fitness Landscapes and Its Application to Maturation of the Immune Response.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 141 (2): 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80019-0.
Maynard Smith, J. 1970. “Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space.” Nature 225 (5232): 563–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/225563a0.
Ostman, B., A. Hintze, and C. Adami. 2012. “Impact of Epistasis and Pleiotropy on Evolutionary Adaptation.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279 (1727): 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0870.
Weinreich, D. M., and L. Chao. 2005. “Rapid Evolutionary Escape by Large Populations from Local Fitness Peaks is Likely in Nature.” Evolution 59 (6): 1175–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01769.x.
Weissman, D. B., M. M. Desai, D. S. Fisher, and M. W. Feldman. 2009. “The Rate at Which Asexual Populations Cross Fitness Valleys.” Theoretical Population Biology 75 (4): 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2009.02.006.
Wright, S. 1932. “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding, and Selection in Evolution.” Edited by D. F. Jones. (Menasha, WI), 356–366.
Zuckerkandl, E., and L. Pauling. 1962. “Molecular Disease, Evolution, and Genetic Heterogeneity.” Edited by M. Kasha and B. Pullman. (New York, NY), 189–225.